<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>We The Peeps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wethepeeps.net/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s Fault is it Anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2011/01/fault-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2011/01/fault-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 03:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trudy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BP Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=1401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you own a business you usually want to make money so your business continues to prosper. It cost money to run a business and sometimes ‘accidents’ happen in a business that will cost you money. I'm a business owner and I own equipment for that business. When people/companies call me to use my equipment, I am happy because I have work.  What happens if a company, who hires me, wants me to do something that most likely would destroy my equipment or it puts my life, or the people that work for me, in danger using the equipment in a way that isn't usual procedure, if I listened to that ‘paying’ costumer, although I knew the riskiness that was in the job description, but did the job they were 'paying' me to do anyways? Who, in your view would be responsible? Would it be me the one who knows the equipment and its capabilities? Or... The company or homeowner who told me to do it since they were paying? Or..]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2011/01/fault-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presidents Tyranny!!</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/12/presidents-tyranny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/12/presidents-tyranny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trudy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BP Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rembering 9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Banks and the Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The war on terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks - Friend or Foe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corpocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=1272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Afghanistan assessment of strategy, sent out by the Obama administration has announced that the progress of the War on Terror mission is fragile, and could easily be lost. They also didn’t give much description of the assessment on the unclassified summary, the administration released late Wednesday of the classified National Security Council-led assessment.



I believe, The Rolling Stones gave us more information by General Stanley McChrystal’s candid interview.  What else do we really need to know?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/12/presidents-tyranny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank you BP,&#8230;. and I&#8217;m sorry.</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/06/thank-you-bp-and-im-sorry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/06/thank-you-bp-and-im-sorry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trudy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BP Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bp_oil_spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/06/thank-you-bp-and-im-sorry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you BP for not listening to the law that says you are not responsible after $75 million in clean up done by you. I applaud any effort you have done from the point beyond the $75 million.

See, at first, I was so angry I couldn’t see straight. I am seeing this ugliness plastered all over the t.v. screen, on my computer, and over the radio. Everyone of these technologies have put your name in the spot light to direct my anger at you.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/06/thank-you-bp-and-im-sorry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lie, Sarah, Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/05/sarah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/05/sarah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TJCIII</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats, Republicans, and Independents - OH MY!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big_oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental_disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil_spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah_palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday April 30th, Silly Sarah Palin updated her Facebook page with a letter titled “Domestic Drilling:  Why we can still believe”.

 

In the third paragraph of this letter, Sarah Palin states “Alaskans understand the tragedy of an oil spill, and we’ve taken steps to do all we can to prevent another Exxon tragedy, but we are still pro-development“.  Really Sarah?  REALLY?????

 

May I remind her that this spill happened 21 years ago?  For a woman to state that after 21 years we are still in pro-development in creating safety standards and protocols only means the government is only dragging its feet because they are in bed with big oil, and being paid off so these corporations can put profits before safety.

 

I know a lot of you are going to defend this woman to your last dying breath, but what interests me even more is an interview she had with Larry Kudrow on June 26th, 2008.  Here is an excerpt from the interview:

 

Kudlow: Why don’t we just liberate, and decontrol, and deregulate the whole bloody energy business – whether it’s oil, gas, shale, nuclear, coal, natural gas, as well as wind and solar – why don’t we just decontrol, deregulate, go for an America first energy policy? Get independent of Saudi Arabia? America first. Create all of these millions of high paying jobs. Why isn’t anybody talking about that in this race? That’s the natural, Reaganesque thing to do]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/05/sarah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go South Sarah!</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/05/south-sarah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/05/south-sarah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 17:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TJCIII</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats, Republicans, and Independents - OH MY!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big_oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental_disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah_palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is in response to a video that was posted about someone complaining that President Obama is going south to view the catastrophe caused by the oil giant British Petroleum. This video states that Obama is the one supporting this type of IRRESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOR by the oil giants. Let me ask many of you that supported the chant “DRILL BABY DRILL” If your going to ignore the need for the United States to explore and move to RENEWABLE ENERGIES, why are you not protesting against these companies for not having a backup plan to stop and avoid these such disasters? Why are there no safety protocols put in place by the oil giants to stop any type of disaster or do we not care about our environment and our only home we know as planet Earth? If you are going to whine and complain that President Obama is going south to view this catastrophe, how come your are not demanding that Silly Sarah Palin is not going south to help clean up this mess she so promoted with such ignorance and stupidity? You see, if your going to chant “Drill, Baby, Drill” I want to see you “Clean, Baby Clean”. You [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2010/05/south-sarah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green verses Fossil Fuel Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/09/green-verses-fossil-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/09/green-verses-fossil-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SahSen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the US today we rely on a Fossil fuel economy for just about everything we do. It’s estimated that each and every one of us in the US uses 7 gals of fossil fuel a day. These 7 gals a day includes not only our cars but what we use in our houses, generating electricity, growing our food, getting our food to our tables, the packaging. Most all of the goods we purchased for our homes, the homes themselves, have had several touch points with fossil fuels in the making, transporting and continued use. We can multiply those 7 gals by approximately 300 million people that live in the US]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/09/green-verses-fossil-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Gorges Dam: Environmental disaster?</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/08/3-gorge-dam-environmental-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/08/3-gorge-dam-environmental-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trudy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three gorges dam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/08/3-gorge-dam-environmental-disaster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 3 Gorges Dam in China sits on the 3rd largest river, called the Yangtze River. It now has the world’s largest hydro powered project in the river. It is infamous for being the most notorious dam. Why is it notorious?

1.	It has displaced 1.2 million people from their homes.
2.	It has flooded 13 cities, 140 towns, and 1,350 villages.
3.	Human rights violations:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/08/3-gorge-dam-environmental-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

