<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>We The Peeps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wethepeeps.net/tag/intolerance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Help Get Out the Vote!</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/11/vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/11/vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>margot707</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop_8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington: Who we are: Approve Referendum 71 is the campaign to preserve domestic partnerships in Washington State. By voting to approve, voters retain the domestic partnership laws that were passed during this year's legislative session, including using sick leave to care for a partner, adoption rights, insurance rights, and more. What we need: We need phone bankers to get our supporters out to vote. Washington is an all mail-in ballot state, and we need to ensure our supporters put their ballots in the mail. Also, youth turnout is a critical component of our campaign, and youth turnout historically drops in off-year elections]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/11/vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a Hate Crime?</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/10/crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/10/crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>margot707</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race relations in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal_rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people have commented about the recent incident in Florida where five boys set fire to another. They expressed their "outrage" about why isn't it called a hate crime when the victim is white. Details revealed that this was not a "hate crime" and that race had nothing to do with the incident. According to the FBI: "Crimes of hatred and prejudice-from lynchings to cross burnings to vandalism of synagogues...  the term "hate crime" did not enter the nation's vocabulary until the 1980s, when emerging hate groups like the Skinheads launched a wave of bias-related crime. The FBI began investigating what we now call hate crimes as far back as the early 1920s, when we opened our first Ku Klux Klan case]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/10/crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homophobic Singer Boycotted in California</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/10/homophobic-singer-boycotted-california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/10/homophobic-singer-boycotted-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>margot707</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal_rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop_8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's an email I recently received. Apparently this character has gotten the boot before. SPEAK UP ON TUESDAY AND BEFORE (To read the original open letter, click here or at the link on the left.) Jimmy Smith, jrsmith@co.humboldt.ca.us , 707 476 2391 Clif Clendenen, cclendenen@co.humboldt.ca.us , 707 476 2392 Mark Lovelace, mlovelace@co.humboldt.ca.us , 707 476 2393 Bonnie Neely, bonnie.neely@co.humboldt.ca.us , 707 476 2394 Jill Duffy, jduffy@co.humboldt.ca.us , 707 476 2395 Friday, October 2, 2009 AN OPEN LETTER TO HUMBOLDT On June 9 2004, Brian Williamson was found murdered at his home. Williamson was the public face of the gay rights movement in Jamaica, one of the most homophobic places on the planet. Rebecca Schleifer of Human Rights Watch arrived at Williamson's house to find a crowd singing and dancing]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/10/homophobic-singer-boycotted-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will destroy the freedom of religion?</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/08/who-will-destroy-the-freedom-of-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/08/who-will-destroy-the-freedom-of-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TJCIII</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Constitution, you have to love it.  Not only does it guarantee us our freedoms we enjoy and that many good citizens have died for to protect, but it also is there to protect us from our own self-righteousness. I have heard many times before that the atheists, agnostics, and the Muslims are taking away the right to practice our religions.  You see and hear this on TV, certain websites, and many, many blogs. Is it really true it’s those non-believers that are fighting hard to take this right away, or is it the religious themselves the ones destroying this right guaranteed by the constitution? The reason why I bring this up is because of the fear and propaganda I am hearing about the current president of this great nation.  I have heard time and time again that he is a Muslim and he is out to destroy us. When we accuse this man of being a Muslim, are we not taking away his freedom of religion?  Are we not demonizing someone else’s belief and telling the world his belief should not be allowed or accepted?  Are we not telling people that we should not have the right [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/08/who-will-destroy-the-freedom-of-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lady Liberty, we failed you</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/07/lady-liberty-we-failed-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/07/lady-liberty-we-failed-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TJCIII</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats, Republicans, and Independents - OH MY!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal_rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  You gave us a place to hide from those who persecuted us; and we turned around and persecuted others. You gave us a land where we could be equal; and we chose to deny it to others because they were different. You gave us freedom, and the pursuit of happiness; and we enslaved nations and impoverished them all in the name of greed. You gave us a home for the brave; and we have forgotten them and let them become homeless. You gave us miles of wilderness, lakes, and wildlife; and we poisoned it with our pollutions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/07/lady-liberty-we-failed-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we stopping free speech or avoiding potential problems?</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/06/are-we-stopping-free-speech-or-avoiding-potential-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/06/are-we-stopping-free-speech-or-avoiding-potential-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TJCIII</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past weekend in Dearborn Mi was the 14th annual Arabic Festival. Its a fun little festival on Warren Road where many people of both arab descent and non arab descent come to and enjoy good food, arabic music, etc. This year, a christian religious group was barred from handing out christian literature to any of the visitors. In case you don't know, Dearborn MI has the largest community of Middle Eastern people outside the Middle East.  There is a large muslim community and some christians here. My question is, was the federal judge blocking this group from passing out literature trying to avoid a potential confrontation considering many people stick to their religion and will fight to the death to protect it, or was he blocking the religious groups freedom of speech? I do know a lot of muslims, and many of them do not want to be bombarded with another religions literature.  I myself am sick of the daily literatures dropped at my door that are pro muslim and pro christian]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/06/are-we-stopping-free-speech-or-avoiding-potential-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the stance against gay marriage hypocritical?</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/06/is-the-stance-against-gay-marriage-hypocritical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/06/is-the-stance-against-gay-marriage-hypocritical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TJCIII</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal_rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop_8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so sick of hearing people state that allowing gays to marry will destroy the foundation of marriage. First off, almost 50% of all marriages end in divorce. These marriages are currently between a man and a woman. So how do we come up with the myth that gays will destroy the foundation of marriage? If gays cannot marry, which they cannot in most states, how are they really destroying the foundation of marriage? All I hear are the religious reasons why they cannot marry and one secular reason why gays cannot marry. The main secular reason is because 2 men cannot procreate]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/06/is-the-stance-against-gay-marriage-hypocritical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious Intolerance</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/06/religious-intolerance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/06/religious-intolerance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TJCIII</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These videos were taken earlier today in Lansing Michigan during the pride festival and the rally at the state capital.  This group of so called "christians" seem to show up when ever someone they deem as unholy come together to celebrate who and what they are.  The following videos were interesting to say the least.  When I went to film the parade, they made their way to the person with the camera and shouted their hate.  Near the end, you will see where they actually admit their hate]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/06/religious-intolerance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NOM Board Member Advocates Overthrow of Government, Criminalization of Homosexuality</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/05/nom-board-member-advocates-overthrow-of-government-criminalization-of-homosexuality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/05/nom-board-member-advocates-overthrow-of-government-criminalization-of-homosexuality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TJCIII</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found the following article earlier today. I was actually shocked to see how far one group will go to deny the rights of another. Is this even acceptable behavior of any American group? Should any group advocating this be allowed to form in the United States? If you are a Christian do you support this, and if so, why? People For the American Way calls on group to reject remarks In response to the launch of the Carrie Prejean ad campaign against marriage equality, People For the American Way president Michael Keegan issued the following statement: If the National Organization for Marriage wants to make the comments of a gossip columnist and a beauty queen the subject of a national debate, then it should answer for the bizarre and troubling remarks of its most prominent board member – best-selling science fiction writer Orson Scott Card. The NOM has argued that it is not a homophobic organization, but Card's remarks suggest otherwise. Card, who represents the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on the board and received an effusive welcome last week from NOM president Maggie Gallagher, supports criminalizing sex between same-sex adults: Laws against homosexual behavior should remain [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/05/nom-board-member-advocates-overthrow-of-government-criminalization-of-homosexuality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Christian &amp; The Athiest</title>
		<link>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/04/the-christian-the-athiest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/04/the-christian-the-athiest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TJCIII</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wethepeeps.net/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  One is Christian, the other is atheist! One says he loves you, the other says he hates you. The question is – which one says what and why?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wethepeeps.net/2009/04/the-christian-the-athiest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

